Friday, September 19, 2025

Selective 'Cancel Culture' Outrage

ABC's late night TV host, Jimmy Kimmel 
Free speech advocates on the left are absolutely apoplectic over ABC’s abrupt cancelation of Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night TV show. He was canceled for making a reprehensible comment suggesting that Charlie Kirk’s murderer was just as likely to be a MAGA supporter as an anti-MAGA supporter. Don’t think so? Judge for yourself. Here is the offending comment:

“The MAGA gang” was “desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them” and trying to “score political points from it.”

For the record, I don’t think his show should have been canceled over that. He should be entitled to say whatever he pleases, as long as it doesn’t incite violence. I do not believe this comment came anywhere near doing that. That said, I also believe an employer has the right to fire anyone they choose for any reason, provided it does not violate their civil rights. If an employee’s behavior harms the company’s bottom line, that is surely cause for dismissal.

Be that as it may, I can’t say I’m not happy about it. I am. To the best of my knowledge, Jimmy Kimmel is a nice guy. A family man, kind to others, who has never hurt a soul. And he has a great sense of humor.

But Kimmel also represents exactly what is wrong with the entertainment industry, which wields enormous influence over public opinion. That influence is steeped in a left-leaning philosophy that, for example, glorifies the LGBTQ agenda while dismissing anyone who dares to oppose it as ignorant Neanderthals seeking to deny a vulnerable community their civil rights. This is the universal approach of nearly every prominent name in entertainment. To finally see one of those powerful voices removed from the air is, in my view, a positive step towards the values I cherish.

One of the main accusations leveled at ABC is that it caved to political pressure from the White House—as though Kimmel had never before insulted the president or his MAGA supporters. That is patently false. Late-night comedians like Kimmel (and perhaps even more so, Stephen Colbert) have been ridiculing the president and his supporters from the very beginning of his first term. In all those years, no one suggested canceling his show.

But this time, the comment wasn’t a joke. If there was humor in it, I fail to see it. It was a deliberate smear of the president and his supporters—using the tragedy of an assassination to score political points, while accusing the other side of doing the same. That’s what caused FCC Chairman Brendan Carr to complain, and what ultimately moved ABC to cancel the show.

What fascinates me (not in a positive way) is the selective outrage from the left over what is now widely recognized as ‘cancel culture.’ That’s when someone is ‘canceled’ for expressing an opinion that does not align with the prevailing cultural orthodoxy. Until now, the left denied it even existed. But clearly it does. Some examples:

  • In 2011, Glenn Beck lost his Fox News program after advertiser boycotts tied to his sharp political commentary.
  • In 2017, Professor Jordan Peterson faced publishing boycotts, speaking cancellations, and demonetization attempts after refusing to comply with gender pronoun legislation.
  • In 2019, J.K. Rowling faced boycotts and disinvitations over her gender-critical views.
  • In 2020, opinion columnist Bari Weiss was bullied into resigning from The New York Times, largely because of her outspoken support for Israel.
  • In 2018, ABC canceled Roseanne Barr’s hit TV show after she tweeted what was widely perceived as a racist remark about Valerie Jarrett.

That last case is especially relevant to Kimmel’s cancelation. Unlike the uproar over his free speech rights, not a peep was heard from today’s free speech warriors in defense of Roseanne Barr. In fact, quite the opposite happened. Her cancelation was loudly cheered. Barr’s explanation that her remark was not intended as racist fell on deaf ears.

But when one of their own gets canceled? Suddenly, it’s an affront to free speech. I guess free speech only matters when it serves your own agenda.

That’s the thing about self-righteous political views. Those who hold them are true believers. They think their views are expressions of incontrovertible, self-evident truth that cannot be refuted by any rational person. So, when their ox is gored, they feel extreme moral outrage. But when their opponent’s ox is gored, well, that’s just fine—because their opponent’s ox was ‘immoral’ and deserved it.

And yes, friends, that is the world we live in. It’s why Israel’s war for survival is now painted as genocide. You cannot argue logic or facts with people whose self-righteous worldview is immovable. They watch TV, and they ‘know’ what’s happening: IDF soldiers are just a bunch of Nazi storm troopers.

With the cancelation of Kimmel and the looming end of Stephen Colbert’s show, there is at least some hope that the dominant left-leaning cultural influence might begin to shift.

As for Kimmel’s future? I would have no problem with his show being restored, provided he issues an apology to the president’s supporters - and generally stops treating them as ignorant Neanderthals, which his humor often suggested. If he wants to criticize the their conservative policies through comedy, he should do so with a modicum of humility - treating his opponents as equals with different views, not as morons to be endlessly ridiculed.

16 comments:

  1. Dominant left culture-who are the biggest owners of TV stations-Nexstar, Sinclair-neither liberal by any means. Nextar needs FCC approval to become even stronger 1st place owner of TV stations coincidental or not that they told ABC won't carry Kimmel.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Have been plenty of Conservative talk shows-Gutfeld , has more watchers than Colbert or Kimmel

    ReplyDelete
  3. HM, your post contains some inaccuracies. Colbert is a devout Catholic who doesn’t make fun of Trump’s supporters, religious conservatives, or other everyday people. Neither did Kimmel, at least not very often. But both have made fun of Trump. Bari Weiss was run out the NYT for reasons completely unrelated to Israel or her political opinions in general. Jordan Peterson did not run afoul of gender pronoun legislation, as there was and is no such legislation, at least in the U.S.

    I don’t see how the elimination of late-night comedians who make jokes about Trump is a step toward the values you cherish. It is a bad, bad thing when the president can censor public political speech that ridicules him. That violates the First Amendment. It is equally bad when a president can use the powers of his office to jawbone broadcast license holders into firing on-air employees who make jokes about him or oppose his policies. The Supreme Court has specifically held such jawboning to be unlawful. Not that ABC or CBS will take Trump to court over this. But their inaction will threaten the right of free speech — which, I assume, is a value that you cherish.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Recent support of Trump administration actions that anyone would have thought illegal 10 years ago shows that everything depends on whose acting that way. Of course, dealing with a big, bragging lair who maintains Russia wouldn't have invaded Ukraine had he been there. Drump let his deadline against Russia pass wo even token sanctions. Russia has invaded territory of Estonia today, not first during TACO reign.

      Delete
    2. FWIW Eisner former CEO Disney put out tweet favoring Kimmel.

      Delete
    3. I may be off on some of the details of the others. But not be much. And I recall Bari Weiss clearly saying that her pro Israel commentary is what generated her NYT colleagues to bully her into resigning.

      If Trump was upset by Kimmel's ridicule of him why did he wait til Kimmel made a crack about Kirk's murder to exert his influence? He's been doing it at least since 2016. Furthermore, the very comment that got him cancled is a direct attack against Trumps supporters.

      Both Kimmel and especially Colbert have made some truly ugly comments about Trump - passing it off as humor. CI have heard them and they are disgusting. Comments that by implication implied that those that his MAGA supporters are equally disgusting.

      Free speech? No one is stopping Kimmel from saying anything he wants. He just can't do it and stay employed by ABC.

      Delete
    4. Bari Weiss did indeed complain that her colleagues at NYT pushed her out because of her pro-Israel commentary. But her colleagues had no power to push her in any direction. The editors got rid of her because she was what they call in baseball locker room poison. She didn’t get along with her teammates or her hitting coach.

      Neither Colbert nor Kimmel have routinely implied that their sharp criticism of Trump, which wasn’t always intended to be funny, can be imputed to Trump’s followers. Other comedians have done so, but network late-night TV hosts know better than to that. Perhaps you felt they were attacking Trump voters, but that would be you, not them.

      ABC could fire Kimmel for any reason or no reason at all, except if doing so violates its contract with him. Trump, on the other hand, cannot legally leverage the regulatory power of the FCC or the FTC, which is in itself illegal, to force ABC to fire Kimmel lest the company’s parent corporation be denied permission to undertake a merger or be stripped of its broadcast license. Not even the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling would allow the president to do so.

      And yes, if the president pressured ABC to fire Kimmel, that would be a clear-cut First Amendment violation under the case law. I’m sure the president’s legal advisers know that. But Trump thinks he can get away with it. He probably will.

      Delete
    5. What do you think Kinmmel meant by 'the MAGA gang? Surely that was imputed to Trump’s followers. And I doubt that Trump was directly involved with Kimmels' cancelation.

      Delete
    6. The MAGA “gang” are Trump’s staff, department heads, lawyers, and congressional allies who jumped on Kirk’s assassination as a PR opportunity to blame it all on transsexuals, leftists, etc. A “gang” is a relative small group. It cannot refer to half of the voters in the country. Would you describe the millions of Germans who supported the Third Reich as a “gang”?

      Delete
    7. True. I suppose you really can’t call about half the country who voted for the president a gang. But still His disparaging use of the phrase MAGA Implies that people who describe themselves that way are themselves to be disparaged.

      Delete
  4. Does Trump speak politely about his political opponents? When he starts acting like a mensch then complain about those who make fun of him. SNL makes him look stupid but they have done it for decades against the Presidents.
    ABC can fire Kimmel anytime they want-what at least smells inappropriate if not illegal is at least implied threats by Prez and his FCC appointee.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What you say about Trump is true. But two wrongs don’t make a right.

      Delete
  5. None of the cases that Ive seen cancelled before this were because a Prez and an FCC chairman warning dire consequences if dont get rid of Kimmel. Kimmel's words were not appropriate-but it was Trump and his henchmen who acted improperly by threatening business interests of companies if keep on making fun of someone who boasted Russia wouldn't have invaded Ukraine if he were President-fact is increasing attacks on Ukraine and violations of Estonia, Poland sovereignty too-see how afraid they are of TACO

    ReplyDelete
  6. In most of the examples cited above, no one was "canceled." To choose just one, Harry Potter books still sell in the millions, and a new TV series based on them is in production. In addition, there is a world of difference between a network canceling a program because they sense the public is outraged about it and this case. Here, the FCC threatened ABC affiliates that a merger they proposed will be rejected if the continue to air the Kimmel program. This is government censorship of speech, not private industry decided what is worth their while to broadcast.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The FCC did no such thing. They may have implied it, but they clearly did not threaten it. I do agree, however, that they shouldn't have even implied it. And ABC should NOT have canceled his show because of the disgusting things he said. That said, ABC did cancel it and they were well within their legal rights to do so. And I'm glad it was.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There was plenty of talk (even proposed legislation) to "censor" vaccine deniers during the Biden Administration.

      Delete