Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Jerry Greenfield - the Poster Child of the American Jew

Jerry Greenfield (left) and Ben Cohen (VIN)
Even though it is certified Kosher by the Kof-K, I have never had Ben & Jerry’s ice cream. Not for political reasons. But simply because I’ve never had the opportunity. Plus the fact that I’m not much of an ice-cream lover. It is my understanding, however, that it’s quite good.

The two founders, Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, are Jewish. They represent, I believe, exactly the reason so many Jews are abandoning their Judaism. Which, in a nutshell, is a widespread ignorance of what Judaism really is.

While I’m pretty sure both Ben and Jerry have identified themselves as Jews and have not consciously abandoned their Jewish identity, if they truly understood what it means to be a Jew, they might very well abandon it. If one looks at some of the values they cherish, one can see that those values are the opposite of authentic Jewish values, which are, of course, based on the Bible we call the Torah.

I bring this up in light of the following AP story published at VIN:

Ben & Jerry’s co-founder Jerry Greenfield is leaving the ice-cream brand after 47 years, saying that the independence it once had to speak up on social issues has been stifled by parent company Unilever. In a letter Greenfield said the following:

“For more than 20 years under their ownership, Ben & Jerry’s stood up and spoke out in support of peace, justice and human rights, not as abstract concepts, but in relation to real events happening in our world.”

“(At) a time when our country’s current administration is attacking civil rights, voting rights, the rights of immigrants, women and the LGBTQ community.”
“Standing up for the values of justice, equity, and our shared humanity has never been more important, and yet Ben & Jerry’s has been silenced…”

One may recall that the controversy erupted when Unilever, the parent company of Ben & Jerry’s, reversed the brand’s decision to disallow its franchise from operating in Judea and Samaria. That was the kind of ‘social justice’ they pursued. They have also been at the forefront of supporting Palestinians in Israel’s war with Hamas in Gaza. Greenfield felt that he could no longer allow his values to be violated and resigned as a spokesman for the company he co-founded.

When Jews focus only on values that are either common to secular culture — or worse, are opposed to Jewish values, how does that make them remotely Jewish other than by the happenstance of birth? It is true they are technically Jewish for that reason and always will be, no matter how far removed they are from their Jewish mandate and roots. But they are not living as Jews. Declaring themselves Jewish by embracing ‘social justice’ (in this case for Palestinians in Gaza, Judea, and Samaria) does not make them any more Jewish than embracing a particular sport. Just because social justice for Palestinians is more altruistic than baseball does not make it any more Jewish.

Jerry Greenfield is probably a nice guy, but he is nonetheless the poster child of the American Jew who dedicates his life to social justice and to no other aspect of Judaism. They might be proud of that dedication and consider it the epitome of Judaism. But pursuing social justice is not uniquely Jewish. You don’t have to be Jewish to oppose racism. If I recall correctly, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was not Jewish.

If your children pursue social justice, they need not call it Judaism. For them the main thing is the justice itself. And if your children are not particularly inclined to pursue social justice, there may be nothing distinctly Jewish in their lives to identify with. So why bother?

And what about Jerry Greenfield’s claim to be pursuing social justice in this case?

Is supporting Palestinian claims to the land without the context of Israel’s legitimate claim - really pursuing social justice?

Is opposing security measures that make life so difficult for Palestinians in Judea and Samaria without considering the massive numbers of Palestinian suicide bombings over the past 50 years - really pursuing social justice?

Is supporting Palestinians in Israel’s war in Gaza without the context of the October 7th massacre – really pursuing social justice?

Without considering the needs of your own people, is that really pursuing social justice, or is it pursuing selective social justice? Being either clueless about Jewish rights and needs -  or worse, not caring - is not a Jewish trait.

Add to this the treatment of the Bible as an outdated book that espouses immoral mandates (by the cultural standards of the day), and there is nothing Jewish about you, denials to the contrary notwithstanding.

So yes: Jerry Greenfield is the poster child for the American Jew who is ignorant of the biblical values that define his people and substitutes the cultural values of the day. But calling them Jewish doesn’t make them so.

I’ve got news for Mr. Greenfield: the values he calls Jewish and projects onto the Jewish people will lead to the extinction of American Jewry as he knows it. And sadly, it is already happening.

14 comments:

  1. There is nothing uniquely American about Jerry Greenfield’s brand of Judaism. It is the standard “good Jew” type of image that secular Jews have tried to shown ever since 19th century emancipation. The “good Jew” was assimilated, secular and useful to the demographic in his country that he was trying to curry favor with. They always tried to distinguish themselves from the “bad Jew” who was backward, too visibly Jewish and suspected of dual loyalty or worse. Were everything to remain the same but American public opinion would change, they would change their views too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On the contrary. Jerry Greenfield is the prototypical American Jew whose values reflect the liberal ethos of the general culture.

      Delete
    2. The surrounding culture is represented as much by your conservative viewpoint as liberal.

      Delete
    3. It’s true that the country is divided. But the liberal ethos has definitely determined the direction our culture has taken by virtue of the influences of Hollywood and the media. All one has to do is to look at how far the LGBTQ agenda has advanced to realize that. The idea that gay marriage for example is now accepted as the norm is surely an indication of that.

      Delete
    4. LGBT agenda with freedom for minorities including Jews has expanded worldwide. The world much more believes in live and let live as far as beliefs go. That has been good for Jews who reject fundamental beliefs of the vast majority of the world. A lot of our problems come from the fact that we are not a religion in the western sense. We are a ethno-religion. Of course, that can create problems for Jews-be attacked for being part of ethno religion of a state which may take positions the world hates. We are part of Am Israel. Of course, rubbing in differences in Diaspora can create problems-see e.g. many schules may display a flag of a country not US.
      We survive only in an environment NOT based on other religions.

      Delete
  2. I don’t like overly thick, gooey ice cream with concentrated flavors. It’s fattening and unhealthy. Better to opt for a homemade Italian ice.

    What does Ben & Jerry’s have to do with Judaism other than the fact that Ben and Jerry are both Jewish, and that many Jews are drawn to sweet, unhealthy dairy desserts? I mean, who cares?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is exactly my point. Ben & Jerry’s has nothing to do with Judaism. But they are typical of the American Jew. Whose Assimilation combined with ignorance of Judaism is causing so many younger Jews to abandon their heritage. And if they are altruistic, they will embrace the ethics and morals of the general culture. The fact that they don’t have to be Jews to do that is why so many of them are abandoning Judaism.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Okay, there are these prototypical assimilated altruistic secularized liberal leftist pro-LGBTQ Jews who are willing to criticize Netanyahu and his coalition, Trump and his regime, and the MAGA martyr Charlie Kirk who was brought down so brutally and tragically in his prime by a crazed assassin who must’ve been some sort of liberal.*

      What are we to do with these Jews? They do not reject or hide or obfuscate their identity as Jews two or three or four generations off the boat. They often make a point of reminding everyone that they are proud of their religion (as they define it) and their cultural roots. But they do not embrace halachic morality as Orthodox rabbis define it. They don’t embrace Orthodox rabbis. They don’t accept Scriptures as a bedrock of hard-right ethicality.

      So, what shall we do?

      Nothing. Nothing at all. It’s none of our business. America was, until very recently, a free country. Secular American Jews have no obligation to themselves, their עדה, or Orthodox notions of religiosity to accept any theories of morality except those codified in civil and criminal law.

      They don’t have to explain themselves to frumkeit or erlichkeit or yiddishkeit. They are not religious Jews in our sense, but they are Jews. Leave them alone.

      Except for their role in manufacturing icky-thicky ice cream. I hate that stuff. Send them off to prison for that.
      ——————-
      *Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night TV program was cancelled today because of his network’s (meaning the Trump administration’s) objections to his comments about Charlie Kirk, just as Stephen Colbert’s show was cancelled because his network was afraid of retaliation from the Trump’s antitrust regulators. Attorney General Pam Bondi made clear on Monday that she will comb the Internet and cull those whose lack of respect for Charlie Kirk is tantamount, as she sees it, to a call for violence or an excuse for Kirk’s assassination. Accordingly, where appropriate I will attach an apologia to assure all that in certain contexts I loved Charlie Kirk and agreed with all of his many political positions except where I didn’t.

      Delete
    5. No. The program was cancelled cause a good number of local stations did not want it.
      The free market at work.

      Delete
  3. Much of our history has shown that when Jews are accepted elsewhere high percentages leave. Obviously, compare world Jewish population with population today, it has not in general been pogroms the cause. Costs way too much especially because of Yehoshua ben Gamla decree many Jews left Yahadus-when raise the bar people leave.

    ReplyDelete
  4. https://www.ynetnews.com/article/bk9azbyoxe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A third? Not surprised. In fact I'm surprised it's that much.

      Delete